Inside Job!!!
...by Panagiotis Traianou
Attempt on Trump...
…Like a lamb being led to slaughter…
…Betrayed by his "guard"!
.
The biggest problem that the current power system faces today is that it can no longer easily "stage" situations that suit its politics. Witnesses of events, who until now were easily "misled" and spread rumors to confirm or reject what suited those who "manipulated" them, have now become reliable "reporters"! They have cameras with them, and what they "see" they "transmit" accurately to others! Something that wasn't seen in a moment of confusion can now be reviewed at home with ease. Something they thought they saw in their turmoil can be confirmed as not having happened. All these characteristics of our era are due to the technology of image production and transmission, which is available to everyone.
We live in an era where everyone carries a camera and has become accustomed to capturing moments, they consider important. Whether they go to a concert, a political rally, or a sporting event of their children, they have learned to record events they think are worth remembering. If this is combined with the fact that they can share their experience on social media platforms like TikTok, we are talking about a revolutionary development. Consequently, it is mathematically impossible for a significant event not to be recorded from thousands of different angles in a place where people gather, and this result can be shared worldwide within minutes. If until now the power system could "filter" and present information to the public only as it suited itself, today it cannot do that. Information spreads uncontrollably, and you don't know where it might end up.
What used to be turned into "official" history by the power system with a few unreliable "witnesses" can no longer be repeated today! This is what happens in the case of the assassination attempt on Trump. The power system cannot record as "history" only what suits it! Even now, new elements concerning the Trump assassination attempt are coming to light… Countless pieces of evidence, "stored" in so many cameras, making it impossible for the authorities to create the "truth" that suits them. What does this evidence tell us? That we witnessed a premeditated political execution that simply failed… We saw live what is called an "inside job." Literally, they led Trump like a "lamb" to be "slaughtered"! They targeted him for execution and just failed, as there's always the possibility of failure no matter how well-planned an operation is.
To understand how significant this is concerning the credibility of the disseminated information, consider this simple fact: Even today—with so much real evidence available for this attack—some people, for political or ideological reasons, consider it very likely that this assassination attempt was a "staged" performance… "Staged" by Trump himself and his "team." They think it's "logical" for someone to stand a hundred meters away from an amateur shooter, aiming at his ear to create a "heroic" image of himself… To stand in front of an unskilled "William Tell" to increase his electoral percentages… They consider it "logical" for the shooter to accept being killed like a dog afterwards! And yet! There are millions of people ready to reject all available evidence and, of course, logic, to believe the "truth" that suits them. If this happens today, imagine what has happened in the past with similar events that we now consider historical "truth"!
You don't need to be an expert in security matters to understand the security "gaps" that could have been fatal for the former US President, and it's clear these were not due to ignorance! First, the "sinful" FBI came out to mislead the public… Trying to get ahead of developments and "push" them in a direction that leads nowhere… To "bypass" the evidence that eyewitnesses had concerning the event itself. It immediately focused on the identity of the perpetrator, to "explain" the assassination attempt on its own terms… The usual "fairy tales" of secret services! …Again, they started leaking information about the "lone wolf," who for ideological reasons acted alone to execute a politician at a political rally… A "very convenient" profile for the FBI of Zionist Democrat Garland… A "Republican" and "heavy weapon" supporter killer.
This is done with ulterior motives. Why? Because this is the privileged field of secret services and informers… Because there you have to find relationships and dependencies, which may remain forever hidden and never be revealed… Nothing may be revealed because there might be nothing! The identity of the assassin does not explain everything! Some might have "fished" him from the internet and assigned him a mission that would make him rich or famous without even knowing them… Some others might have "fished" him from a mental research "lab" and turned him into a "zombie" with psychotropic drugs, giving him a purpose in life. You will NEVER learn anything once he dies because these people ALWAYS die regardless of whether they complete their "job" successfully or not. We never learned what Lee Harvey Oswald had to say, and we will never know what Thomas Matthew Crooks would have said.
So, the important thing in this case is not the identity of the perpetrator! Potential perpetrators will always exist, whether they act out of orders or stupidity. The job of security forces is to stop them, not to "analyze" them. The important thing, in these cases, is to determine if certain security officials help these perpetrators become effective! …To determine if there was a conspiracy! The important thing is to see the behavior of the services when they came "face to face" with the perpetrator! The important thing is to determine whether they betrayed Trump or not! …If they facilitated the perpetrator to kill him or not! …If they offered the target to the perpetrator on a "silver platter"! This is important because it can be judged immediately and with absolute objectivity. This is important, and it is influenced by the evidence that all eyewitnesses now have thanks to technology.
You don't have to wait years for investigations involving people and their relationships… You have audiovisual material that the authorities didn't have time to process or destroy, and you study the behaviors of security personnel… From there, you draw conclusions about whether the guard was "staged" or not… Whether they collaborated with the perpetrator or served the politician whose security they were entrusted with. If you find—based on the existing evidence—that they facilitated the perpetrator in carrying out his mission, you easily "lead" to the "bosses." Why? Because the bosses of both the perpetrator and his accomplices ARE THE SAME! Therefore, it is easier to reach the "end" through the professionals than through random fools.
What did we see through the electronic "eyes" of eyewitnesses in this case? …The Medrano circus, and in a country that supposedly boasts about its secret services… A country that considers its security services the "elite" of "elites" of corresponding services… A country that has set up an entire "industry" in Hollywood to "export" its know-how on the security of high-profile figures. All this "collapses" in a moment in an era when every citizen has a mobile phone with a camera and can record and thus capture what they "see."
What did we "see" through the "eyes" of thousands of witnesses at the event? …We saw a place where the event took place… An easy place to study to ensure its control… An outdoor level area that security services certainly studied for days if not weeks before for its security. It had TWO "suspicious" points! …A water tower and a building a few meters away from the event. A static event with very few security demands. It wasn't, for example, an open speech in a large urban center with thousands of potentially dangerous points. It wasn't an open car convoy passing through a metropolis with thousands of apartments, like in the case of Kennedy's assassination… It was a speech in a "field" with few suspicious points around it… A building with a white roof that even a cat climbing on it could be seen from miles away.
Simultaneously, from the images circulating on the internet, we didn't see a cunning assassin with murderous instincts! …We weren't dealing with a "Jackal" type killer… It was a half-witted kid! …An unfit amateur who barely managed to climb to the roof of a relatively low building. He wasn't "Spider-Man." Housewives who went for a picnic at a political rally spotted him struggling to climb to the roof of the building from which he would attempt… He climbed the roof with a portable ladder. Is it possible that in an area within the security perimeter of such an important event, involving such an important—politically—figure, someone carrying a gun with a ladder can wander around without being stopped for a check… To be spotted by ordinary citizens who inform the police and the police NOT act! …To be "shot" by citizens with their mobile phones, and the professionals not notice him??
All these are NOT normal and can lead to the truth of what happened. Who was the police officer who received the citizens' complaint and confronted the armed "suspect"? Who did he communicate with, and whom did he report the incident to? Was the standard procedure followed? Who decided NOT to inform Trump's guard about the incident? Even without this "insignificant" policeman's communication, the guard itself seems not to be performing its duties properly. There are videos—several seconds before the shots—that show the secret service snipers spotting the "gunman" suspect and allowing him to complete what he started… Videos showing them only shooting after the attempt!!!...
Under normal circumstances, the snipers who killed the perpetrator should now be arrested and interrogated. Why? Because they are responsible for a murderous attack reaching the point of being carried out! They saw three minutes earlier—with the public's help—a man who didn't belong to their team aiming a weapon at the President. They had all the options in front of them. They could inform his guard to pull him off the podium until the suspect's identity was verified. They could shoot him since he was armed in an area the secret services considered "sealed." They didn't have to kill him! …They could shoot him just to neutralize him. What did they do about all this? …NOTHING! …They let him aim calmly and only after the shots did they execute him… like mafia hitmen who don't leave witnesses behind! …They had three whole minutes to decide… and with a crowd urging them with shouts to neutralize the threat.
These people should now be arrested and interrogated… All their communications should be studied for the entire period of interest to the secret services. Who did they communicate with to act the way they did? Who set the engagement rules, and in what points did they violate them? Who did they inform once they identified the "threat"? Who ordered them to wait? They are allegedly still searching to find out if the perpetrator acted alone. Of course not! …He didn't act alone! …It's just that his accomplices aren't on the "side" they're looking for! …He acted with those who helped him and those were the ones "guarding" Trump! An accomplice is not only the one who takes "loads" for the same target… An accomplice is also the one who provides "cover" so someone can complete the target alone. For this reason—and once the shooter failed in his task—within seconds, someone ordered Trump to be picked up and rushed into the car to be whisked away. How were they so sure there was no threat? …That there wasn't another weapon aimed at his head?
We saved the most ridiculous part of the case for last! …The ridiculousness that exposes the WOKE New World Order, which today wants to dominate the World and mainly opposes Trump! …The evaluation of the personnel deployed by the secret services for the protection of the former US President! There—REALLY—things reached absurdity… We saw—after the shots—three short, fat, and untrained women running around aimlessly like headless chickens! …Doing nothing with great "haste," pretending to be agents! …Did they assign Trump the cleaners from Langley for his security? …These women wouldn't even be put as security at a children's party!
We mention their height not for racist reasons, but for objective ones! …You don't hire for security—of potential targets—with quotas, to avoid "discriminating" against women in a professional field. The height of a person selected to perform the role of a bodyguard is proportional to the height of the one they are to protect. When the ultimate goal of this protection is for the bodyguards to form a "wall" of safety with their bodies, it is implied that they should fully cover the protected person! This "wall" of safety in Trump's case—whose height is 1.90m—always had a huge gap due to these women… Due to these short women! …These women, who instead of covering the "target" with their bodies, hid themselves behind him! …These women, who, for security reasons, ran alongside Trump's car and were shorter than the car door handles. Even if his male security personnel wanted to do their job, the "wall" was turned into "Swiss cheese" by their female colleagues.
We mention this to show how seriously the secret services took Trump's security. How they treated such important positions for personal security as if they were jobs in accounting or a small factory. The only gain from this situation was the nice "heroic" photos of Trump. What is a nightmare for bodyguards—and it is the "exposure" of the head of the protected person to the assassin's aim—became possible because there was always an interruption in the human body zone due to a short bodyguard, leaving the protected target's head exposed. If instead of the photographer, who "shot" with his camera for such a clear photo of Trump's face, there had been an assassin actually shooting with a gun, then we wouldn't have had a good photo but a sure funeral. Every "clear" photo of Trump could have been a bullet to his head! …THIS is the definition of the absolute failure of his bodyguard team!
But, aren't some people responsible for selecting this bodyguard team? Who are they? Who decided to choose these useless individuals? Is this why the director of the Secret Services doesn't resign from her position? Why doesn't she resign when she is responsible for the biggest fiasco in the history of high-profile security? …For a fiasco that exposes American services worldwide? …For a fiasco that has made them a laughing stock among all corresponding services? We are talking about a "cocktail" of betrayal and incompetence, where no one can say with certainty which of the two is worse! But why should the responsible person of this "cocktail" resign if she did what she was instructed to do? Why should she resign when she executed the orders of her "bosses," who are Zionists Garland and Mayorkas? Why should she resign when what happened was predictable?
How could the woman know what she signed up for? …She worked at Pepsi before taking over the Secret Services of the "Superpower"! She just "decided" —at a purely operational level— that 30% of the security personnel hired should be women. What does it matter if they can't handle a brawl with drunks in a café? …"Equality" must be upheld!!! …They should hire some from the LGBTQ community for the same reasons! …After all, the one who hires them got her position in the Biden administration from the same quota. It's a good thing they didn't make her director of a sperm bank, because she might have tried to get 30% of the sperm from women.
All these things we describe—revealing the tragic-comic events of this fortunately not fatal attempt on Trump—were made possible because of technology. Technology allows us to see the actual events as clearly as possible and thus what will be recorded as historical truth in the future. If technology didn't exist, today we wouldn't have the precise and true data that allow us to comfortably study the situation. We would be in the "dark" of misinformation by those who write history as it suits them… At the mercy of information monopolies, which are pure propaganda.
For us—based on the data we analyzed—there was betrayal from very "high up"… and from very "inside"! …From the very directorate of the central secret services of the US and, of course, from their superiors in the White House. Trump was led to the "slaughter" and was just lucky. However, besides "high up," we believe there was betrayal from "inside" his close family circle. We wonder if his Zionist son-in-law—with his close ties to the Mossad—knew they were taking his father-in-law to the "slaughter"… If he knew that his wife was destined to be "orphaned"… If he knew that the grandfather of his children was being prepared for the "great journey"… We didn't see the one who followed Trump even in his visits to the Vatican wandering somewhere at the Republican Congress after the attempt! …Was he perhaps memorizing some—now unnecessary—emotional eulogy?
There are many dark points—unfortunately for Trump. Given the involvement of such powerful service factors—and the electoral needs of a completely corrupt authority—one thing is certain… Trump does NOT have guaranteed longevity… They will try again to kill him and much sooner than we can imagine… Nothing is over yet.
.