The discussion pertains to Marxism…
...text by Panagiotis Traianou
The discussion pertains to Marxism…
…Nazism and communism represent two facets of the same Marxist ideology…
…Marxism stands as a formidable adversary to humanity…
…Expressions of Marxism are the left and right "extremes" of the steel "vice" of fascism!
.
The Marxism of the financial speculators of the Jewish ghettos, associated with certain marginalized groups and unscrupulous individuals, is the sole "ideation" that has posed a significant threat —allegedly— to the very existence of Hellenism.
It is Hellenism that will ultimately supersede Marxism wherever matters of knowledge are concerned. Much like a resilient and enduring force, Hellenism will diminish the influence of Marxism. This distinction underscores the contrast between a formidable entity that accomplishes its objectives and an inconsequential parasite that merely contributes to disturbances.
Indeed, Marxism has a notable tendency to influence individuals and societies. It is important to emphasize that Marxism is not an ideology but a mindset. Unfortunately, this mindset is detrimental. It reflects the thinking of those who conceived it in impoverished and dimly lit corners such as ghettos and taverns. This mindset can be traced back to figures like Marx, Lenin, Marcuse, as well as Hitler and Goebbels. It is characteristic of those who, when entrusted with any tool, do not employ it for its intended purpose but rather wield it as a weapon.
Whether it be a simple screwdriver, a precise scalpel, or a sturdy hammer, such individuals are inclined not towards repairing what is broken, performing life-saving surgeries, or creating anything of value. Instead, they employ whatever is at their disposal to inflict harm, manipulate, and intimidate. It becomes a matter of chance and choice as to whether a Marxist adopts the path of Rosa Luxemburg or follows the sinister footsteps of Hitler. Whether they veer towards communism or Nazism, both of which represent different incarnations of the same totalitarianism rooted in Marxism, the underlying mindset remains strikingly similar. It is the instrument they hold in their hands that ultimately determines the nature of the threat they pose.
This aspect of Marxism, particularly as associated with the individuals of Jewish descent, diverges significantly from Hellenism, a cultural tradition that Marxism opportunistically leverages, sometimes even to its detriment. The paradox lies in the stark contrast between the professed ideals of the most influential Marxists, often nurtured within academic institutions and influenced by the likes of Marcuse, Friedman, and Dershowitz.
These Marxist scholars, while well-versed in the works of philosophers such as Plato, Aristotle, and Socrates, often take pride in being labeled as "Greek" during their college years. However, society does not witness a benefit from their intellectual pursuits. Their post-academic trajectory frequently diverges from the noble aspirations of Greek philosophers, who sought to contribute to society and attain the highest levels of renown.
Instead, many emerge from their educational journey driven by a hunger for material gain, akin to ambitious merchants. Their focus pivots toward financial pursuits, seeking to accumulate wealth by capitalizing on the knowledge they have acquired, essentially turning it into a commodity. It appears that the more substantial the investment they made in their education, both in terms of time and resources, the more inclined they are towards ruthless and avaricious behaviors within society.
Marxists often assume the role of "advocates," readily available to represent various individuals, but they seldom embody the roles of "physicians," "engineers," "industrialists," "farmers," or engage in scientific or productive pursuits themselves. When they are not acting as legal representatives for individuals, they frequently position themselves as self-proclaimed proponents of abstract "theories" or "concepts." These affiliations frequently bear the suffix "-ists," encompassing designations like "Sociologists," "Economists," "Laborists," and "Journalists," among others. Typically, these "-ists" share a common characteristic of being more akin to "merchants" dealing in diverse ideologies rather than being distinct "producers" of tangible goods or services.
NOTHING is their own creation. Their approach appears to involve acquiring a range of concepts and ideas during their extensive educational journeys, often likened to "bulk shopping" at academic institutions. Subsequently, they assert their authority by offering these acquired concepts individually, adopting a "retail" mentality within the realm of private economics. This stands in contrast to Hellenism, a ideology celebrated for its unparalleled contributions to human knowledge and innovation, solidifying its status as a profound "creator" and benevolent purveyor of wisdom throughout history. In essence, this contrast serves as a fundamental point of contention.
The purported spiritual conflicts between these groups are essentially contrived maneuvers, resembling orchestrated conflicts. Their primary aim is to exert influence on a global scale, often resorting to the threat of armed conflicts, promoting their proposed solutions, and engaging in opportunistic dealings at the grassroots level of politics. These disagreements and disputes occur within a predetermined framework designed to serve their own interests while adversely affecting others.
These manufactured conflicts, often financially supported by the Jews, are pursued with the intention of gaining control over global society and appropriating its intellectual wealth. Through illicit means, including theft and deception, the Jews have sought to usurp the historical role attributed to the Greeks, rising to prominent positions within society. However, it is inevitable that the Jews, who resort to theft and deceit, will ultimately face the consequences of their actions.
This underscores the urgency of addressing what can be described as a scourge marked by greed, suffering, and hypocrisy, which must be brought to an end.
.
.
Panagiotis Traianou
.